Discussing the ambiguity of a century cemented into a narrative of labour forces used with a repeat of unknowing.
A distraction.
Shifting ambiguous labour classes and construction to major infrastructure built during the mid century.
Every exploration starts at a river, therefore every archaic map that likely took generations for the endeavour to return to where they started and to remember why give purpose to a collective movement from a story from someone else.
History of quarry methods.
Again Roman and Egyptian.
Bricks the ethos of modern labour in terms of independence for freedom to work alone and not spend time setting one stone in a team.
“but they were giants, they did, they did do it on their own”
Oh that red white green brotherhood huh.
Maybe the history of urban architecture the radiocarbon dating of building materials to confirm not just…
Energy to hold together versus energy to rip apart how much of architecture and urban functionality to be “stable” relies on either or, or just a reiterate scheduling of a now autonomous tram or truck.
Nothing is new.
Overt military force stems from insecurity.
Hence the dances for diplomacy.
Start an argument, get caught in the conflict as a form of romance instead of have the real conversation.
Make it better make it worse, then I can avoid that other reality thrown at me.
I have never seen a hearse.
At least you have both Maria Theresa and King Loui in the Austro-hungarian 1700s narrative.
Poland, how low does your Warsaw metro central really go? G’dansk?
The 1900s war, the ghetto, the famine.
On repeat, in a different location for the hunger of the pine.
G’day.
Dare you Mate.