The problem in between.
Those that aim to profit, “every experience I am exposed to must have some use or purpose”.
Society continues.
Modernises, stabilises somewhere always.
Meanwhile, the problem.
The problem evolves due to the ethos of an ego demanding it be useful to coexist.
The problem becomes more powerful, problematic.
Traumatic, hemorrhagic or hemostatic
holographic
gymnastic
dogmatic geriatric decided to go galactic
Wiped out a whole ethnographic
When elastic and electrostatic?
Climatic only the Atlantic?
aerodynamic to
inelastic and intermetallic
intrathoracic and unromantic
metachromatic?
tragic pick up a semi-automatic?
bacteriophagic potentially rheumatic?
Sold faith in democratic and bureaucratic.
bureaucratic
bureaucratic err.
From the problem beyond the original problem of the little girl. The reaction of others, never knowing how to learn from how everyone coped, what went wrong, the person’s in their lives who needed to profit, dogmatic in
“every experience I am exposed to must have some use or purpose for the loss of sense to make sense.”
When people experience something and do not have to factor in cents.
Of society as the little girl did, to keep on keeping on. Knowing sharing her energy to stabilise her surrounds was ok.
Sense of familiar and being, feedback cycles to learn from.
Until one day she could stabilise her life without feeding others more of what they need, but all they wanted was more.
Something, something to avoid the fraud.
That started with the ethos, everything must be of use to them not an appreciation of the equilibrium.