What band[width] to join?
Or proving democratic human to human involvement in determining the aforementioned zones of ambiguity. When the silica based glass fiber optics and aluminum of 1990’s sea cables seem to bother me.
Legislation regarding who owns the road, what is the toll. For ROADM Reconfigurable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexers, let alone a liaison between known owners or rather those who hold the IRU, Indefeasible Right of Use.
Then the new agenda of world radiocommunications article 1.11 to 1.12
“to consider… space-to-space links among non-geostationary and geostationary satellites in the frequency bands 1 518-1 544 MHz, 1 545-1 559 MHz, 1 610-1 645.5 MHz, 1 646.5-1 660 MHz, 1 670-1 675 MHz and 2 483.5-2 500 MHz allocated to the mobile-satellite service…”
“to consider… the mobile‑satellite service and possible regulatory actions in the frequency bands 1 427-1 432 MHz (space-to-Earth), 1 645.5-1 646.5 MHz (space-to-Earth) (Earth-to-space), 1 880-1 920 MHz (space-to-Earth) (Earth-to-space) and 2 010-2 025 MHz (space-to-Earth) (Earth-to-space) required for the future development of low-data-rate non-geostationary mobile‑satellite systems”
To a neighboring countries legislation
When the bottom of a nuclear reaction is laid with steel cable, hence the securities around, lack of transparency regarding access to any manufacturers information.
Certification, or lack of means to correlate, what is in effect filling the world with hate [then consider GOKI is both Korea’s Bluetooth hotel manager & Guam Okinawa Kyushu Incheon, oh hello].
ACMA page nine, for further details on PTS- Public Telecommunication Services
Mobile to satellite frequency band legislation, to even know how to prosecute to execute who does not abide by legislation. Unacceptable interference 2.5GHz and above.
All too frequent that frequency level.
To take part in a world agenda to talk MHz only, when the abuses from GHz for industry advertisements is the real issue!?
What frequency do you need to omit for attention, maybe ask TATA, or whatever.
or use the continents existing legislative instrument or determine a formula to consider;
“[the overlap of] space-to-space links among non-geostationary and geostationary satellites within the range of 1.5-2.5GHz allocated to mobile-satellite services…”
“[the overlap of] mobile‑satellite service and possible regulatory actions within the range of 1.4-2.02GHz required for the future development of low-data-rate non-geostationary mobile‑satellite systems”