Togetherness as a species requires an acknowledgement of the baser aspects of our existence. The driver of urges that do not fill our basic needs.
Yet are a part of the human experience. The themes of cleansing of spirit and surrounds as a means to determine a sense of highness starkly contrasts what we experience today that of those with wealth as their marker for status. Such as say the enchelons of society filled with plutocrats and technocrats.
For cleanliness was to ward off disease, to not be a vector. However now the morals and ethics regarding passing on disease are so complex.
What is low, how that varies.
There is learning through error, the repeated mistakes of the past, the clinging of terror.
How to lift those in despair without being dragged down. Or accept that the modes of despair and grief and longing are not fixed states, what support those need to move through with autonomy.
As despair and grief must be allowed in a just society not seen an otherness or an ill state that one might catch and conform to.
Longing however, unnecessary desire is where is gets complicated. Basic needs include touch, care humans need as children as a nuture for we only fully develop with a dependancy on one another.
How needs and desire get sullied through the course of our life.
How whatever dysfunctions a human experiences in nurture they repeat again as a norm to them.
What is low, well some might think visible waste in society to be lowly, however waste is always there. Anthropogenic waste consolidation and the lack of any international company with significant enough financial backing to take on this global issue. With all the money circulating around the world.
So many solutions for this problem in existance, even solutions in nature such as types of fungi to consolidate our waste footprints of plastic and oil.
What is low, well we all are as people.
The human condition. Both low and high.
Yet the powerplays that dominate the age of misinformation we are entering.
The risks to human intelligence at the military level seeing the potential of running “risk models” for outcomes while also replacing peoples “need” to think through the problem. To trust in “AI”.
It is but a tool in an arsenal. Without using humanism in a system of tactics in a military setting, then humans are simply existing as fodder for the same modes of inaccessibility to baselines needs that permeates through all of our societies. That somehow serves computer dominance.
Our individual intelligence is built by going through problems and gaining experience in real time to calibrate a vague prediction of what could be in any industry or scenario.
We cannot simulate the world as a means to control what we “want” to, as it shall just breed a larger antithesis. The need for ongoing stochastics.
See the waste problem shall always shift back into the war game dialogue.
If only we could fund waste solutions as much as war.