How much hog wash do people need?

The symbols to regulate health in the cloud of a region. The weight of what we collate, without audit.

Why to what end.

Ongoing dance, self auditing versus a focus on automation.

Automation in digital systems then a live simulation from a home pc gets thrown into the mix. Equates to real time events yet not necessarily the hazard zones created by the mathematics of one play of potential, chance for management or manipulation of any system. Requiring order or reorder.

The interdependances of any order in natural system. Not exactly a paralel to a paralellogram scenario. Why we relied on the hexograms of hydrocarbons as a means to determine a different kind of rain.

Yet that is not so safe these days.

Languages and pain.

O worlds of many worlds!

To scale or exacerbate an issue.

Priorities and futureproofing usually end in a lack of zen. I might just get a hen.

Fresh eggs is the solution they say.

Ah not so much now.

GMO in the chicken industry gives me a weird dream sleep like no other.

Realm regulation.

Neurealm’s comment on LLMs impact on data engineering when LLMs have known ambiguities.

“From generating SQL to automating metadata, LLMs offer great promise but also pose challenges around hallucinations, governance, and validation. I concluded that LLMs serve best as intelligent copilots, enhancing rather than replacing human oversight.”

https://www.neurealm.com/blogs/smart-data-pipelines-with-ai-architecture-patterns/

Can we trust intertek SAI social and global accountability?

https://saiassurance.com.au/tricertification/

When we never agreed on national standards for any chemicals in industry fire regulatory boards etc without more electricity.

https://iabac.org/blog/the-intersection-of-ai-and-data-engineering-building-intelligent-data-pipelines

Then “automation of insecure bonding data audit system” and not get spruiked you need artificial intelligence that is clinical.

Yet many do not audit personal datasets to create an easy means for that AI to exist.

Auditing personal data becomes a red flag?

Words and ambiguities in one language, then how many languages do you think are required in a healthy script.

How is that time and space offset and to where?

Tactics, every dataset can be scrambled. And a bully never allows anothers personal narrative. But how important is a personal narrative in the scheme of cohesion, valid to identify use in the system not just flow for an accuring mass of unknowing (to be used as a bomb, with maybe some magnetised plasma)…

Alot of systems require a recreation of habitat, yet the focus on that recreation.

What is the limit to collectively focus on integrating to the physical cycles of the world versus integrating into something other.

What are the education standards you take into your high class technocrat for wealth maintenance as an ongoing dependancy to physical world systems versus requirements to the natural systems that settle themselves.

Can the limits of your data architecture settle themselves without the ETL/ELT dependancy system. Or is hominin urban terrain now just a linkage system? To benefit who?

Larry curly mo? No.